It is deeply regrettable that in our country often litigations between the landlord and the tenant are fought up to the stage of the Supreme Court and when the tenant loses in this Court then he starts a second innings through someone claiming to be a co-tenant or as a sub-tenant or in some other capacity and in the second round of litigation the matter remains pending for years and the landlord cannot get possession despite the order of this Court. Tuli and others, deprecating the conduct of the tenant after the first round of litigation was over by getting inducted another person, this Court expressed its anguish as under: - вЂњ4. We also clarify that the landlords are not allowed to let out the released building (in the existing condition), and they shall demolish the building for reconstruction for which the building has been released by the authority concerned. 24659-60 of 2002 on, challenging the order passed in the writ petition by the High Court. Needless to say that this Court has already dismissed Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. The District Magistrate and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow, are directed to provide every assistance in execution of the order of release, affirmed by the High Court in Writ Petition (R/C) No. 3763 of 2007, shall be forcibly dispossessed within 48 hours in compliance of this order, as directed above. However, keeping in mind that there are several occupants (inducted unauthorisedly without any allotment order), on humanitarian ground they are allowed three monthsвЂ™ time from today to vacate the premises voluntarily, whereafter they or anyone occupying in their place along with respondent Nos. We further direct the Competent Authority (Additional District Magistrate, City, East, Lucknow) to execute the Form-D. 5688-89 of 2007, filed by the respondents (contemnors before the single Judge of the High Court) are liable to be dismissed. 3763 of 2007, filed by the landlord, deserves to be allowed, and Civil Appeal Nos. The time has come that this malpractice must now be stopped effectively.вЂќ In view of law laid down by this Court, as above, and considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and conduct of respondents whereby persons in large number inducted unauthorisedly by them without any allotment order, Civil Appeal No.

LAW FOR ALL : In Atma Ram Builders Private Limited v.

The time has come execute order 66